If it looks like corruption and smells like corruption - then it's most likely corruption
There’s a trope with bomb-makers in films that they are often portrayed as ‘lone nut’ types - they sit there quietly in their flats, their houses, and a lot of the time, their sheds or garages with an invariable preference for working in solitude, tinkering with wires, explosive elements and all manner of volatile substances.
They appear to be methodical individuals; patient - often looking through magnifying glasses with soldering irons, eyes fixated on circuitry, circumspect welds and painstakingly crafted pieces of what I gather they probably view as works of art.
In any event, what they do eventually create is designed with one purpose in mind - to hurt, to maim, to cause damage and in most case, to kill.
Now, the political context of this is that Dominic Cummings has arrived back on the scene and is arming his own bombs on Twitter having taken to the social media platform to warn Boris Johnson about an impending ‘deep state’ attack; and nobody appears to know exactly what that might entail.
Or - and the chances are quite high - whether Dominic Cummings has finally given up the ghost on his own sanity.
But it doesn’t matter.
Because ultimately if Dominic Cummings is going to dress himself up in a suicide vest and run at the Prime Minister screaming about AI and cryptocurrency, who are we to argue - right?
Here’s an example of ‘a bomb’.
Incidentally, the bomb that Cummings ‘lobbed’ in that particular tweet was partially the subject of an article I wrote back in March about the mainstream media catching up with ‘gonzo journalists’ and independent commentators [like me!] on the story that relates to the suspicious circumstances surrounding Evgeny Lebedev’s peerage.
This has consequently become the subject of much intrigue from certain portions of the media - obviously - as a result of the recent skirmish in Ukraine and how the UK government is - not only potentially but actively colluding with the Russian state.